Archive for May, 2010

Debt Collectors want a piece of you!

Thursday, May 27th, 2010
Chopping off my little finger
Image by timtak via Flickr

Debt collection has become more and more out of control these days with the spiraling economy. More people are in debt and are unable to pay. Collectors have become more aggressive and even using illegal tactics to get consumers money.

I understand these debt collectors are doing a job, but if lies and deceit are in the job description, maybe they should get another job. I am tired of hearing collectors say “‘consumers should pay” and “why am I the bad guy?”. If your job description has you lie and even steal, the answer is not ‘the job’, it’s your own morals and values that are the issue. Most consumers didn’t ask for a credit card with the intention of not paying, they feel bad about not paying and want to find a way to pay something back without taking food and shelter away from their families. That is quite different from these debt collectors making a decision to lie and deceive consumers on a daily basis. This country needs more people like our clients who feel responsible and try to correct their situation.  We don’t need people who go to work everyday to take advantage of the public who have had more than enough hardship in their lives.

Most states Attorney Generals are looking into debt collection companies due to the obscene amount of complaints. Unfortunately, the real issue is the laws and processes are not suffice, and not in place, to handle the violations. See below to see some statistics on how you could be affected if you are in debt, and without the protection of a law firm. Sad but true, most consumers don’t know most of the collection calls they receive are illegal. If you are in debt and want to see what options are available to help fix your situation, call us directly at 877-343-3289 or fill out our contact form here DRLG website and we will contact you within 24 hours. We can help with debt resolution, bankruptcy, and lawsuits if you have been sued by a creditor.

Results of SurveyUSA News Poll #15325

1

How familiar are you with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the federal law regulating the behavior of debt collectors?
750 Adults All Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Very 7% 10% 5% 4% 10% 7%
Somewhat 18% 15% 22% 15% 18% 22%
Not Very 33% 34% 32% 31% 33% 35%
Not At All 41% 41% 40% 47% 38% 35%
Not Sure 1% 1% 2% 3% 0% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Composition of Adults 100% 50% 50% 36% 39% 25%

2

Have you or a member of your family been contacted by a debt collector in the past 5 years?
750 Adults All Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Yes 44% 46% 42% 58% 44% 25%
No 53% 50% 56% 39% 54% 72%
Not Sure 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Composition of Adults 100% 50% 50% 36% 39% 25%

3

Did the debt collector inform you of your rights?
332 Who Were Contacted All Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Yes 6% 6% 6% 7% 3% 9%
No 89% 87% 90% 90% 89% 85%
Not Sure 6% 7% 4% 3% 9% 6%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Composition of Who Were Contacted 100% 52% 48% 48% 38% 14%

4

Did the debt collector treat you with respect? Or disrespectfully?
332 Who Were Contacted All Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
With Respect 26% 28% 24% 33% 22% 13%
Disrespectfully 70% 69% 71% 67% 71% 77%
Not Sure 4% 4% 5% 0% 8% 10%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Composition of Who Were Contacted 100% 52% 48% 48% 38% 14%

5

Did the debt collector threaten you in any way?
332 Who Were Contacted All Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Yes 43% 43% 42% 46% 40% 40%
No 47% 44% 51% 43% 51% 52%
Not Sure 10% 13% 7% 11% 9% 8%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Composition of Who Were Contacted 100% 52% 48% 48% 38% 14%

6

Did the debt collector call you again after you told them not to?
332 Who Were Contacted All Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Yes 77% 81% 72% 76% 77% 79%
No 19% 15% 23% 22% 15% 16%
Not Sure 5% 4% 5% 2% 8% 5%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Composition of Who Were Contacted 100% 52% 48% 48% 38% 14%

7

Did the collector call people you know such as your employer or a family member?
332 Who Were Contacted All Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Yes 48% 50% 45% 55% 44% 34%
No 42% 46% 38% 33% 46% 61%
Not Sure 10% 4% 17% 12% 10% 5%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Composition of Who Were Contacted 100% 52% 48% 48% 38% 14%
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share

California Enacts Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010
Seal of the Controller of California
Image via Wikipedia

California Enacts Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief

Sacramento -A new state law allows taxpayers to immediately exclude from their income the amount of mortgage debt on their home loan that has been forgiven by their lender. The law largely brings California statutes into conformity with current federal law. Previously, California conformed to federal debt relief only for 2007 and 2008, according to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB).

“California has been particularly hard hit by the housing crisis,” said State Controller and FTB Chair John Chiang. “This is a critical tax change that will help people in our state who already are suffering the loss of their homes.”

The new law, SB 401 (Wolk), allows most taxpayers to exclude canceled mortgage debt income of up to $500,000 on their principal residence. The limit is $250,000 for married/registered domestic partner (RDP) individuals filing separately. It applies to debt forgiveness in 2009 through 2012 resulting from a foreclosure, “short sale,” or loan modification of a taxpayer’s qualified personal residence.

Prior to the law’s passage, these amounts were taxable to California. If you owe a debt to someone else and they cancel or forgive that debt, the canceled amount often is taxable. These amounts are generally reported on a 1099-C and are provided to both the taxpayer and the government. Debt forgiveness on other types of debt, such as a second home or business property, does not qualify for exclusion under the new law.

The law largely brings California into conformity with the federal Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act for discharges that occurred in tax years 2007 through 2012.  However, California’s limits of qualifying principal residence indebtedness differ from federal limits.

Qualifying taxpayers who have already filed their 2009 tax returns should file Form 540X, Amended Individual Income Tax Return, to subtract the amount of debt relief from income. To expedite processing, write “Mortgage Debt Relief” in red across the top of the amended tax return. Taxpayers must attach a copy of their federal return, including Form 982, Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness (and Section 1082 Basis Adjustment), with their state tax return.

Like federal law, the new state law allows individuals and businesses to exempt energy grants that are provided in lieu of federal energy credits from their gross income and alternative minimum taxable income.  It also confirms California law to many other federal provisions.

According to FTB estimates, approximately 100,000 people may benefit from mortgage debt relief for tax years 2009-2012. For more information, taxpayers are urged to visit FTB’s website at www.ftb.ca.gov.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share